RAW Rank v0 · data read 2026-09-02

The ranking is a formula. The formula is public.

All 32 casinos we track, ranked by RAW Rank v0 (data read 2026-09-02): a cited payout delay flag outranks everything else downward, then verification status, then the operator's stated window, then its fee policy class, then moderated player reviews once a casino holds 5 or more, then data completeness. Today's top three: Limitless, Roobet, Bitsler. No payment enters the formula; its inputs are typed dataset fields and money is not one of them. Each casino also carries RAW Score v0, a weighted 0 to 10 summary of its own record, capped at 9 until we can measure payouts ourselves.

Every row shows exactly which inputs placed it. When you disagree with a position, you can point at the input that caused it, which is the entire idea.

#CasinoScoreWhy it sits here
1 Limitless 9 stated window: instant (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: none · reviews below floor: neutral term
2 Roobet 5.9 stated window: instant (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
3 Bitsler 6.6 stated window: instant (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
4 Chips.gg 4.7 stated window: instant (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
5 BitStarz 6.4 stated window: 0-1h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: none · reviews below floor: neutral term
6 Rainbet 8.1 stated window: 0-1h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
7 Gamdom 7.6 stated window: 0-1h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
8 mBit 5 stated window: 0-1h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
9 Cloudbet 8.8 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
10 7Bit 6.7 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
11 KatsuBet 6.4 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
12 Monkey Tilt 4.3 stated window: 24-72h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
13 Spin Samurai 5.2 stated window: 24-72h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
14 Wild Fortune 4 stated window: 24-72h (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
15 Mirax 7.3 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: none · reviews below floor: neutral term
16 Jacks Club 5.5 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: none · reviews below floor: neutral term
17 Bitz 5.4 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
18 Stake.com 7.8 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
19 BetFury 3.7 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
20 BetPanda 5.3 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
21 RakeBit 5.3 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
22 Vave 3.2 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
23 Thrill 3.2 stated window: varies (verified) · no delay flag on record · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
24 Duelbits 4.9 stated window: instant (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
25 Spartans 4.5 stated window: 0-1h (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
26 Wild.io 4.1 stated window: 0-1h (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
27 Shuffle 4.8 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: network-only · reviews below floor: neutral term
28 Mega Dice 3.9 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
29 Metaspins 3.6 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
30 CoinCasino 2.6 stated window: 0-24h (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term
31 BC.Game 3.8 stated window: varies (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: fee-deducted · reviews below floor: neutral term
32 Bets.io 2.5 stated window: varies (verified) · cited delay flag: ranked down · fee policy: undisclosed · reviews below floor: neutral term

The formula, verbatim

Operators sort by, in strict order: (1) cited delay flag present, (2) record not fully verified, (3) stated processing window class, (4) fee policy class (none, network-only, fee-deducted, undisclosed), (5) the player review term, neutral until 5 moderated reviews exist, (6) unpublished data fields. Ties break alphabetically so builds are deterministic. The formula version is in the page title and changes are dated on this page.

The score next to the rank, and why they can disagree

RAW Score v0 is a published weighted formula over the same typed record the rank uses: what the operator publishes, what its terms commit to, what the documented record shows, and how fresh our read is. The rank is lexicographic, a delay flag outranks everything else; the score is a weighted summary of one record on its own. The two can disagree, and when they do, the axis table on the casino page says exactly why. The rank stays the ordering.

Why the score stops at 9

A complaint ledger with resolution rates, and self-measured payout times, are still being built; neither is faked in the meantime. RAW Score v0 scores what is verified today and says what it cannot see: the final point belongs to those inputs, so no operator can score 10 until they exist. The method page carries the formula verbatim and the operator page carries the terms operators work with us under.

Straight answers

How does RAW rank casinos?+
By a published, versioned formula (RAW Rank v0) over verified data: a cited delay flag dominates everything, then verification status, then the stated payout window, then the fee policy class, then moderated player reviews once a casino has 5 or more, then data completeness. Every position shows its reasons.
Can a casino pay to rank higher?+
No, structurally: the ranking function's inputs are typed dataset fields and payment is not one of them. There is no input a payment could move, which is a stronger guarantee than a policy, because it would take a published change to the formula rather than a decision behind a door. Every position shows the reasons that produced it.
Why is the 0-10 score capped at 9?+
Because an honest composite needs two inputs we are still building: a complaint ledger and self-measured payout times. RAW Score v0 is a published weighted formula over what is verified today, printed next to the axis table that produced it, and the final point belongs to the missing inputs. No operator can score 10 until we can measure payouts ourselves, and a casino with a cited delay record is capped at 4.9 whatever it publishes.